I watched Randy Pausch's last lecture (through Maye's multiply) a week ago and something that he said really stayed with me. He said: The walls are there in front of us, not to block our way but to remind us how badly we want something.
It stirred me because what he said was something I partly agree and partly disagree with.
I totally agree that walls are there for a reason. As to what reason that may be, however, is one thing that calls for a lot of deliberation. My take is that some walls are there to challenge us, and thus, as Pausch puts it, to remind us how badly we need something. Sadly, however, some walls are there to serve the one purpose that walls are built for: to block our way. Not to challenge us, but to tell us loud and clear that what's behind it is off-limits.
The context in which I'm saying these things is the one giant, immovable wall that I've been staring at for quite some time now---one that I sometimes look at merely from afar. Should I climb over it? And if I do, would I regret it in the end? Would it be worth climbing? And, will I like what I'd find on the other side?
The value of the speaker's statement is that it gave me a framework with which to evaluate my predicament: Is this wall a reminder of how I want this thing badly or is it there to tell me precisely that this is a dead-end?
I don't know. All I know is that as walls go, this one is specifically hard to climb and should I decide to climb and bruise myself in the process, it shall leave its own special scar that might take forever to heal. And yet, part of me is hoping that this is just a temporary block that I need not even climb right now but that will soon collapse by itself because some mighty force will command it to, one fine day.
In the end, I haven't resolved anything just yet. So for now, I shall apply by analogy what one wise priest once said: LOVE TRUMPS ALL LAWS. Perhaps, this too, applies to walls.
